Welcome to RandoJones.com!

CAPTCHA'd!

Comments (2)
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 @ 1648

I may not be getting many visitors and much less visitors willing to comment, but, as planned, I've implemented ReCAPTCHA.

Pennsylvania's Carnegie Mellon University has developed a product named "ReCAPTCHA" that combines digitizing old books and such with the more common Turing test to both help stop spambots and bring historical texts into the 20th/21st centuries simultaneously.

So if you're about to make a comment, you'll have to prove your sentience by passing the common "what's that word" test.

Get on with it!

-Some Rando


Not a Streak-free Shine, but... Better than Before

Comments (0)
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 @ 1615

Nothing new going on in the last couple of months I'd like to mention here; not yet, anyway.

I deleted the 10 old posts from the database that had no-real bearing on the site as it is now - some were about the old site layout, some were about trivial subjects not really worth reading. For those of you that might'a wished you could read them anyway, sorry, they're GONE-gone and nothing short of a database restore'll bring them back (and that'll cost me some dollars). So say bye-bye.

I also cleaned up the content of the existing posts already visible on the site. By "cleaned up" I mean replaced deplorable language with more... amiable wording. For this you can thank two friends, one old and one new, for convicting me that such language is not necessary to back-up a strong personality. Reagan didn't use it and to follow that lead, I'll not use it here (and I pray anywhere else) any more.

You ladies'll know who you are. ;)

-Some Rando


Your New 4,000-pound Death Machine and You

Comments (2)
Thursday, February 26, 2009 @ 2135

The ICanHasCheezBurger ring of websites is a daily stop for me; usually once in the morning and once in the evening.

A recent post coincides with what I'm certain a lot of people can identify with:

A man is driving his car, suspiciously eyeing the traffic ahead while his cat berates other drivers. Captioned: Backseat Driver Kitteh - Cat saying: Pick a lane, Jerkface!

And another, older, post in a similar vein:

A cat at the wheel of a speeding car appears to by laying on the horn and yelling at other drivers. Captioned: Nice bwinker, Jurkface!

Back to the topic so humorously introduced by the lolcats above: inefficient and/or dangerous drivers.

I had the idea yesterday that perhaps we could improve traffic flow by removing all sources of blinking or intensity-changing lights on highways. What I mean by that is: turn signals and brake lights should be removed from the rear of all cars.

"What?! That's incredibly dangerous!" you blurt incredilously. You don't say! What aspect of driving makes not having brake lights on a car dangerous? Perhaps, say, following too close?

I seem to recall a rule of 1 car-length for every 10 miles per hour. So that means with the assumption 1 car-length is 18 feet, at 60 miles-per-hour you approximately 1¼ seconds to react before you fuse with the vehicle in front of you.

And at what distance are most people following eachother? It's certainly well within the recommened 108-foot buffer. I've got a rule of my own I follow on the highway: if I can't see your front license plate in my rear-view mirror, you're too close.

So I propose the following: if drivers behind you couldn't tell when you were slowing down perhaps they'd keep a healthy distance and stop talking on their phones or eating burritos or taking notes on a legal pad. Though, when I think about it, perhaps we should leave brake lights on cars and just make them light up when the driver really stomps the pedal. I'll make that compromise, put a small aspect of brake light safety back in, but only when its an emergency.

Do yourselves and other drivers some favors:

  1. Back off. Give yourself a buffer. The greater the distance between yourself and the next vehicle means you'll have more time to react and it's possible you won't have to brake at all because everyone ahead of you will have recovered from the snarl.
  2. Don't get pissed off because another driver has a big buffer in front of him. Zipping around him because he's "slowing you down" will save you little more than 1/5th of a second on your commute. Nice one, Jerkface.
  3. You'll travel 1 & 7/15ths feet for every mile-per-hour you're travelling. Do you have ninja-like, Nascar reflexes? Do you know where your exits are? Do you know the position of your vehicle and those around you in case you have to jump lanes in the 1¼ second minimum safety margin you should have?

Turn signals should be removed because they're either often unused or cause other drivers to panic and hit their brakes.

Overcautious, paranoid driver: "AAAHHH! Flashing lights!" Overcautious, paranoid driver's brain: "Ensign! Did you not see that flashing light?! Why haven't this vehicle's decelerators been engaged yet?!" "I-I'm sorry, Captain! Engaging decelerators! Sir, it won't happen again, sir!"

That's how it goes... Yeah. Yeah, pretty much...

-Some Rando


Feel Free to Comment

Comments (0)
Wednesday, January 14, 2009 @ 2307

If'n you've not noticed already, there are links at the top and bottom of each blog post now for adding reader comments.

So if you should happen to feel the need to comment on anything, go right ahead.

I'll add some CAPTCHA later and I'd like to mention if anyone happens to leave comments that are not constructive or belligerent, expect your comment to get "modified" to something more appropriate to the commonly understood Intelligence score of trolls.

P.S.? I'm goin' t' bed. Don't crash my database with spam, please.

-Some Rando


A Must-see Message and a Little Help

Comments (1)
Sunday, December 28, 2008 @ 0101

Two posts in one night - it's post-Christmas bonus time here at RandoJones.com!

I saw this video last year and we played it at church again this year on the 14th. It was produced by Wired Churches which is a ministry of Granger Community Church, Granger, IN and its title is "The Truth (Vertigo)".

The Truth (Vertigo)

I can't put forth a appropriate message to you if this video stirred something within you, I'm sorry. I just watched this again myself and it's got me "all sentimental" (don't take that description lightly).

Additionally, my belief doesn't make me a perfect person, which is evident by some of my prior posts. Just understand this: some believers are hypocritical fools (like me, for calling them hypocritical fools), some really stuggle with taking up following Jesus (like me, by calling people names and gettin' all uppity; sin can be a tough burden to give up), and some people do rather well with it.

The Roman Road is a set of Bible verses that describe what you need to understand about the way to salvation (New Internation Version):

  1. Romans 3:23 - ... for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, ...
  2. Romans 6:23a - For the wages of sin is death, ...
  3. Romans 6:23b - ...but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
  4. Romans 10:9 - That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
  5. Romans 5:1 - Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, ...
  6. Romans 8:1 - Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, ...

And an explanation:

  1. We are all sinners. We have all done things that are against God's will or things we feel, we know are morally wrong.
  2. Every human will physically die once in their lifetime, but those who chose their sin over salvation will be eternally separated from God.
  3. Salvation is God's free gift to you - it cannot be earned through works. You simply have to reach out and receive it.
  4. Jesus took our sins upon Himself and suffered our just punishment in our stead. We just need to believe in Him and trust that His shed blood is payment for our sin - and we will be saved!
  5. The result of the Roman Road is the fruits of salvation: through Jesus Christ we can have a relationship of peace with God.
  6. Because of Jesus' death on our behalf, we will never be condemned for our sins.

It's late and the time has come for purposeful sackin' hittin' (that means "take a nap"). If you'd like to make a comment or possibly need someone to pray for you, send me one of those email deals via the following address: Rando Jones.

-Some Rando


Post-Christmas, Pre-New Year Procrastination (Now With Monkeys!)

Comments (0)
Saturday, December 27, 2008 @ 1959

I saw this on ICanHasCheezBurger.com tonight:

A man bends over to check a monkey lying on the ground while another monkey gets ready to whack him with a pole. Captioned: Monkeys - Never turn your back on them.

And this older one that was linked under the above:

A monkey riding on a swimmer's head with a somber expression. Captioned: Hitman monkey finds no joy in his job.

Don't know why I found the first one so funny. Probably because I thought of the scam/ruse and that these monkeys have apprently got it down pretty good.

I really shouldn't post anything to the website that says "Part X" or "Oh, yeah. I'm gonna keep up with this 'blogging' thing". Last time I did that was October 15th. I still need to follow up on that one... I'd also like to do something more lengthy, but I'll not be makin' any promises that I'll be doin' that because you'll end up gettin' it 74 days later.

Anyway, I was just goin' t' make this quick with the two monkey images. So there ya have it.

More later (no promises!).

-Some Rando


Hardware Interrupts Causing High CPU Usage

Comments (0)
Thursday, October 30, 2008 @ 2110

I've had this happen several times and a restart usually fixes it. Tonight it happened again and I decided to see if I could find out exactly what might be causing it and if there was anything useful on the matter on the Intarwebs.

Unfortunately, the Intarwebs has failed me yet again.. it was the same old thing: "Dudes! My junk is causing problems!" Everyone else: "I know, dude! My junk has the exact same problem!"

Everyone has the same problem, but no one has a solution. Well, I used Process Explorer and found that the entry named "Interrupts" was using a ridiculous amount of resources. It was actually causing my mouse to jitter on the rate of about once a second for about ¼ of a second in addition to most other major process on the system (3D rendering).

So using the trusty Event Viewer (Start->Run->eventvwr.msc-><enter>) and checking the "System" log, turns out I was getting device access errors on my CD-ROM to about the tune of 1 per second - imagine that. Disabling the device using Device Manager cleared the problem right up. I wasn't, unfortunately, able to re-enable it. So I just restarted the system (surprise!).

So as a solution to the problem of the hardware interrupts process of Windows consuming too many resources, check your event logs with event viewer for errors, they're likely to show up. If you can get by with disabling the device until it can be replaced or troubleshot, that'll alleviate your resource consumption.

There you have it, possibly the first answer to this issue the Intarwebs has ever seen!

-Some Rando


Humped into a Corner (Part 1)

Comments (0)
Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 0054

That's what we've done collectively as a nation - we've humped ourselves into a corner.

Who's we? Well I for one contributed to it. I know some dudes that've also contributed to it. Other factors are probably any combination of the following: oil companies, the media, politicians, Satan, fear mongers, Hollywood, "Give-to-Get" schemers, assorted corporations, video games, government programs, global warming, the Internet, pirates, lolCats.

Do I honestly think Ceiling Cat or DOOM have anything to do with society's free-falling humpfest into the first circle of Hell? No, not really.

What I do think is responsible is our (the "general" populace of the United States of America) contentedness with the way things are, our apathy to the current state of our nation, our lazy "let someone else fix it" attitude, and/or our greedy "me first, me most, me now" attitude (again, any combination of these items).

Scandal sells. Sex sells. Pain and misery sell. We want it. We crave it. It's part of our nature.

Think not? What would you rather see: bare flesh or a baby playing with toys? A rather odd set of choices sure, but it speaks a lot about values.

And what we value is people who'll give us more of what we want. So we elect and follow leaders (corporate or government) that promise and sometimes deliver exactly what we're after: more scandal, more sex, more pain and misery. More stuff to satisfy the individual's fleeting lusts than what's actually beneficial to society as a whole.

I'm not talkin' communism or socialism or anything like that, no. Forget that junk - it don't work. Sure some dude made it work or some dudes who get theirs by taking it from others make it work.

No, we're a democracy here. We want a government of like-minded individuals to tell us it's OK for a minority with a loud voice to overrule the silent majority and steer the nation. And seriously, all things considered, in a democracy, who is the minority and who is the majority is largely irrelevant when the only thing politicians understand is "the baller with the fat stacks tells me what rules to make".

And so what we have here is a system where dudes spend millions of dollars ($350 in groceries/week into $1,000,000 dollars is enough food for 2,857 weeks of food {or approximately 55 years}) telling you they're going to change the system and get you your pogostick back because you were overtaxed, up to your curlies in debt, and the repo man took it away. And then what happens? The other 1,500 dudes are like, "No way dude, we just voted ourselves a pay raise and have a 3:30 at Megaresort™. Forget you and the people who believed in you."

None of the parts work together and the parts that do are secretly wondering how long it's going to be before they get all their stuff swiped by the other parts.
~~~~~~~~~~

I think we as Americans need to seriously overhaul every corrupted inch of this Hindenberg before it punctures us fatally and the country goes down in flames in mere minutes.

It's late and it is decreed that we follow the 8-hour, 5-day work schedule without error so I need to hit the planks. I'll continue this later...

Oh, and if I ever die the day after making a post, you'll know a conspiracy's afoot. /tinfoilhat. :P

-Some Rando


Rando "Atom Feed" Jones

Comments (0)
Saturday, September 27, 2008 @ 1442

After a coworker suggested "he'd keep up with my site if I only had an RSS feed", now I have one. I'd been planning on adding one some time ago, but just never felt the urge to actually do it.

Today I did and now you'll be able to see the last eight blog posts on the home page here via the Rando Jones Atom Feed. You can also click on the spiffy Atom/RSS icon there in the main navigation.

So enjoy not having to visit the site to see if I've actually posted anything. I might add another one (Atom or post) later.

-Some Rando


CSS Sandwich of Doom

Comments (0)
Tuesday, August 26, 2008 @ 2110

OK, I don't know why I just thought of this - it was one of those things that just "popped in there".

A while back when we were newbs (not "noobs/n00bs" and definitely not "nubs") we needed some method for including CSS fixes for the way the less-standards-compliant browsers <cough>Internet Explorer<cough> rendered CSS differently than Mozilla Firefox.

Anyway, we had hack-CSS in hack <link> elements, we had hack-CSS in in-style-sheet hack declarations, and we had hack-CSS in regular style sheets. We had something like 7 stylesheets all linked together with hacks known as the CSS S.A.N.D.W.I.C.H. (you can find it with a Google search).

What we came to find out recently was that using all the CSS hacks the CSS Sandwich required actually caused Firefox to render pages incorrectly, even though all the hack declarations were something that had been discovered to explicitly not affect Firefox… affected Firefox.

We later used server-side code to check the browser user-agent and deliver the specific style sheets needed to correct skewed browser problems. More recently, one of our guys has become an absolute CSS/HTML ninja and has managed to make several XHTML 1.0 Strict (if that means anything) sites that validate not only XHTML and CSS, but also WAI-something and Section 508 Schedule 1 (I think); And he's done it with one primary style sheet and one style sheet to unhump Internet Explorer 6.0 and lower.

Anyway the point of this post was to let the Intarwebs know that the multiple filtering hacks the CSS Sandwich contains can actually mess with the correct rendering of CSS/HTML as a whole. So by using the CSS Sandwich CSS filtering hacks, you're actually introducing problems into your rendering that would otherwise not be there; problems you'll then need to correct. It kinda turns into a diminishing vicious circle - it'll eventually look good in all browsers, but the amount of time needed to get everything to look just right'll cost you.

Just an F.Y.I., y'dig?

-Some Rando


Employment Buy-in

Comments (0)
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 @ 1101

You: "What's this? Two posts in two days??"

Yessir. Though unrelated to yesterday's server move (which was quick and successful, by-the-way), I felt the need to inform you of the newest silliness from "that one company".

This organization is starting up a "work-from-home" program to augment their newest domestic call center. The word is that they're planning to hire up to 140 individuals to call their clients' customers that have forgotten that they owe people money, but is placing responsibility of acquiring a particular piece of telecomm hardware on the hiree him- or herself.

You: "Wow. This is some recession." -or- "What a cheap-ass company!" (or the xkcd version).

The least expensive version of this particular item I was able to find with a quick search was $5 and one of less unscrupulous craftsmanship was $15.

Lemme see if I can organize this in a manner to convey my thoughts on the whole thing the instant I saw it (these are not facts, just assumptions and guesses):

3 week in-house training course ×
40 hours per week ×
$8.50 per hour ×
140 trainees
$142,800.00
3 weeks' salary for trainer at $40,000 per year $4,615.38
3 weeks' salary for trainer's assistant or
paid intern at $30,000 per year
$3,461.54
3 weeks' salary for human resources agent
at $50,000 per year*
5,769.23
Miscellaneous supplies of unknown quantity,
quality, or purpose
$1,000.00
Total $157,646.15
* background-check follow-ups, proper and thorough processing of new employees
into the company prior to training period

Money saved by having your 140 new employees buy their own equipment on top of the other equipment costs they've already incurred to get the job: $700 (or $2,100 for the well constructed items).

Percentage of total cost of the 140 pieces of equipment out of the hiring and training cost: 0.444% (or 1.332% for the better ones).

And this assumes that they can gather and train all 140 people at once. Unlikely. So the total training costs are going to go up and the percentage the equipment costs out of the whole are going to go down.

What's worse is they (the company) is offering this item for purchase from themselves! It's almost as bad as a fast-food (sorry, "quick service") restaurant making their employees buy their uniforms.

My overall, obfuscated point: If you're a multi-million dollar company, pony up at least five bucks for a piece-of-junk telephone headset so your new employees can do their jobs and get you that fat commission check from your clients for calling their customers in the middle of dinner using their (the employees') own personal telephone you cheap ass-bastards.

-Some Rando


Hosting Plan Change

Comments (0)
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 @ 1306

Update (20080812@2057): The site has been moved to the new plan and to a new server and is already running. If you can see this updated message, then you're seeing the new site.

I've sent a plan change request for the randojones.com domain to be upgraded to a package with greater bandwidth and database limits to allow for expansion of some of the projects I have going on here (chiefly: the DDO Crafting Helper).

I apologize in advance for those who might experience outages while attempting to access the DDO Crafting Helper (as it's the major lure to the site) and to the site in general (for those of you who just tool around on the Intarwebs).

The transition usually takes less than 24 hours to complete, but DNS records might take up to 48 hours to propagate across the Intarwebs.

-Some Rando


Super Quake Rides Again

Comments (0)
Monday, August 04, 2008 @ 1540

The new Super Quake project is underway. While the new weapons and deathmatch modes and all the other nifty bits haven't been implemented yet, some of the more basic things have.

I'm actually the most pleased with the "in-user-code" map fixes I've been able to do; as I continue to replay the game testing new features I keep watch for things like triggers not firing correctly or doors not releasing off-scene monsters to teleport into the level like they're supposed to as well as areas of maps that look like they should be secret areas but aren't.

Navigate on over to the Quake gaming section for more information and a list of implemented features.

-Some Rando


Getting Fish and Clichéd Phrase Use

Comments (0)
Friday, August 01, 2008 @ 1000

A client of ours recently asked for an update to the copy of a page on their site. At the top of a big pile of miscellaneous acronyms and hardware and software system names was the following: "Our technology interfaces with client systems globally to provide seamless transfer of data from our multiple locations to our clients 24 hours a day, 365 days a year."

Being the overanalytical and cynical wordsmith that I am I immediately thought: "That's actually 365¼ days, nub" and "What about leap years?" Then I thought about how overused a lot of these kinds of terms are and that's when the following IM conversation took place; I was pondering the exact need to state "24/7/365" when it's probably OK to assume that when someone says something goes on "24 hours a day" it covers all 7 days of the week as well as all 365¼ days of the year:

++++++++++
Names changed to protect the innocent?
"Rando Jones" says (9:43 AM):
When you hear "24 hours a day" do you assume that the action takes place every day non-stop including holidays and birthdays or do you assume that there's gotta be like one day where they system goes out to lunch to get some fish and the action stops?
"Jet" says (9:44 AM):
that would be 23 hours a day right?
"Rando Jones" says (9:45 AM):
Well, it'd be "24 hours a day except one day where it's 23 'cuz the system wanted some fish".
"Jet" says (9:45 AM):
so...
"Jet" says (9:45 AM):
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 364 days a year
"Jet" says (9:45 AM):
sort of
"Rando Jones" says (9:46 AM):
Saying "24 hours a day, 365 days a year" obviously leaves out leap years or at least the 6 hours of extra revolution time accumulated each year (that is consolidated into February 29th every 4th year).
"Jet" says (9:48 AM):
There you go...that leaves an average of 1.5 hours each year to go get some fish
"Rando Jones" says (9:48 AM):
That's the perfect time to hack <censored>'s system! It's totally not secure while it's getting fish!
"Jet" says (9:49 AM):
hacking the code of when they go get fish is the key
"Rando Jones" says (9:49 AM):
You mean .. hacking the system into getting fish when you want it to, not when it's a regularly scheduled "get fish" task?
"Jet" says (9:52 AM):
I see, so you infect with some kind of "GoGetFish" worm or virus at a designated time
"Rando Jones" says (9:55 AM):
1: KeepSystemSecure();
2: if (timeToGetFish) goto 4;
3: goto 1;
4: GoGetFish();
5: System.Sleep(3600000); //sleep for an hour
6: goto 1;
"Jet" says (9:55 AM):
LOL
~~~~~~~~~~

If you really must assure your clientèle that your processes run non-stop and without sounding like every security camera, pest control, and adult undergarment provider in the world, why not use "all day, every day" instead? At least no one'll be able to compare you to a company known for enabling people to poo themselves at-will.

Oh, and incidentally, this is the same client that wants us to take screenshots of the entire Intarwebs. Here's a handy link: Bad press release archiving idea.

-Some Rando


A Brand New Bag?

Comments (0)
Monday, July 14, 2008 @ 1418

OK. New look and possibly a new focus.

By the way, if you're looking for the DDO Crafting Helper Page, there it is.

After finally having the necessary time to begin and complete the revisions to the back-end I now have a system I'm happy with. The best part is that it's so very easy to extend or alter. Want to add the ability to add articles? BAM! - done. Want to change the content of a post from HTML back to plain text (for whatever reason)? BAM! - done. Since there was no other content here aside from some links, I've deleted everything else.

Still have work to do, but at least the system works better than originally expected.

-Some Rando


Uninstalling Symantec Anti-virus Corporate 8

Comments (0)
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 @ 1004

When we upgraded to the new Symantec Endpoint Protection 11 security software, we kindof uninstalled everything in the wrong order. Maybe. I didn't read the instructions well enough or I did read them well enough and this was never mentioned, but if you uninstall the centralized management software before removing the software from all the clients and you required an uninstall password, then you'll be unable to uninstall the software from the clients because it's attempting to contact the centralized management server when it no longer exists.

Long sentence short: Through genius design or engineering oversight, this is easily remedied by changing the following registry key, a DWORD, from a "1" to a "0": HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Intel\LANDesk\VirusProtect6\CurrentVersion\
AdministratorOnly\Security\UseVPUninstallPassword. Change that from a one to a zero and retry the uninstall; for me it's worked each of the seven times I've had to use it.

-Some Rando


A Quick Solution

Comments (0)
Wednesday, September 12, 2007 @ 1226

Just something for you .NET developers real quick. I had this problem where we were getting repeated occurances of a CryptographicException with the Exception.Message value of "padding is invalid and cannot be removed".

We were doing some request redirection to send users to an HTTPS version of their requested URL if they were requesting a secured page (online shopping checkout process) which was apparently also redirecting .NET framework requests for "WebResource.axd" and "ScriptResource.axd".

After about three hours of finding nothing but "Hey! I'm having this problem, too! kthx" on the intarwebs, I had to resort to hardcore investigation. Having realized what the hell we were doing in this code, it suddenly hit me (right in the face). Maybe not so much "hit me" as "What the hump?! System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginRequest events can be trigged by requests to .axd files?!"

Solution: If you are getting mysterious CryptographicExceptions and you're globally redirecting requests, try excluding requests to .axd files from that process.

I hope that's clear enough 'cuz that's about all the time I can spare on elaboration right now.

Good day.

-Some Rando

© 2006 - 2009 by Rando Jones